首页> 外文OA文献 >The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities
【2h】

The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities

机译:未来的临床学术人才:对两所研究密集型英国大学的临床博士生影响职业决策的因素的横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To examine clinical doctoral students' demographic and training characteristics, career intentions, career preparedness and what influences them as they plan their future careers.Online cross-sectional census surveys at two research-intensive medical schools in England in 2015-2016.All medically qualified PhD students (N=523) enrolled at the University of Oxford and University College London were invited to participate. We report on data from 320 participants (54% male and 44% female), who were representative by gender of the invited population.Career intentions.Respondents were mainly in specialty training, including close to training completion (25%, n=80), and 18% (n=57) had completed training. Half (50%, n=159) intended to pursue a clinical academic career (CAC) and 62% (n=198) were at least moderately likely to seek a clinical lectureship (CL). However, 51% (n=163) had little or no knowledge about CL posts. Those wanting a CAC tended to have the most predoctoral medical research experience (χ2 (2, N=305)=22.19, p=0.0005). Key reasons cited for not pursuing a CAC were the small number of senior academic appointments available, the difficulty of obtaining research grants and work-life balance.Findings suggest that urging predoctoral clinicians to gain varied research experience while ensuring availability of opportunities, and introducing more flexible recruitment criteria for CL appointments, would foster CACs. As CL posts are often only open to those still in training, the many postdoctoral clinicians who have completed training, or nearly done so, do not currently gain the opportunity the post offers to develop as independent researchers. Better opportunities should be accompanied by enhanced career support for clinical doctoral students (eg, to increase knowledge of CLs). Finally, ways to increase the number of senior clinical academic appointments should be explored since their lack seems to significantly influence career decisions.
机译:检验临床博士生的人口统计学和培训特征,职业意向,职业准备以及对他们规划未来职业的影响.2015-2016年,英格兰两所研究密集型医学院进行了在线横断面人口普查,所有医学合格牛津大学和伦敦大学学院的博士研究生(N = 523)被邀请参加。我们报告了320名参与者的数据(男性占54%,女性占44%),这些性别代表了被邀请人群的职业意向受访者主要是接受专门培训,包括即将完成的培训(25%,n = 80) ,并且18%(n = 57)完成了培训。一半(50%,n = 159)打算从事临床学术职业(CAC),62%(n = 198)至少中等程度地可能寻求临床讲师(CL)。但是,有51%(n = 163)对CL职位知之甚少。那些需要CAC的人倾向于拥有最多的博士前医学研究经验(χ2(2,N = 305)= 22.19,p = 0.0005)。不采用CAC的关键原因是可利用的高级学术职务人数少,难以获得研究经费和工作与生活之间的平衡。研究结果表明,敦促博士前临床医生在确保机会的同时获得多样化的研究经验,并提出更多建议灵活的CL招聘标准将促进CAC的发展。由于CL职位通常只对仍在接受培训的人员开放,因此许多已经或几乎已经完成培训的博士后临床医生目前没有获得该职位提供的发展为独立研究人员的机会。更好的机会应该伴随着对临床博士生的职业支持的增加(例如,增加对CL的了解)。最后,应该探索增加高级临床学术任命人数的方法,因为他们的缺乏似乎会严重影响职业决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号